Inform civil servants of the violation of discipline in examinations in many places. Cheating candidates are recorded in integrity files.

　　Beijing, June 14 (Leng Yuyang) In April this year, more than 20 provinces across the country gathered together to conduct the 2019 civil service recruitment examination. Since May, many provinces have intensively announced the written test results of civil service examinations. With the release of the written examination list, some provinces have also disclosed the disciplinary situation of the civil service examination to the outside world, and many candidates have been recorded in the integrity file of the civil service examination because of cheating, duplicate papers and other problems.

　　The written examination of civil servants in many provinces is released. Examination violations were disclosed.

　　On April 20 this year, 22 provinces across the country held a "provincial examination" for civil servant recruitment on the same day, with a total of nearly 80,000 people planned to recruit. However, compared with last year, the scale of planned recruitment in Fujian, Shandong and other provinces has dropped significantly this year.

　　Although the recruitment plans of many provinces have shrunk, the popularity of civil service examinations in various places seems to have not diminished. Judging from the job competition, according to media reports, the competition for the hottest jobs in Guangxi, Shandong, Yunnan and other provinces exceeds "one in a thousand".

　　Since entering May, several provinces have successively announced the written test results of the 2019 civil service provincial examination. According to the recruitment procedure of civil servants, candidates who pass the written examination will face interview selection next. At present, many provinces have determined the time for qualification examination and interview.

　　At the same time, with the announcement of the written test results, the reporter found out that many provinces including Fujian, Hubei, Hunan and Shaanxi also notified the candidates who violated the rules and regulations in this year’s civil service examination.

　　For example, the Fujian Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security decided to "cancel the test scores and record them in the civil service examination and employment integrity archives for five years" for two people who used electronic equipment such as mobile phones to take test papers during the examination.

　　For another example, the Shaanxi Provincial Personnel Testing Center will treat 38 candidates who have general violations of discipline and discipline at the examination site as "the examination results of this subject are invalid" and warn them once. If the general violation of discipline occurs again, it will be recorded in the integrity file of civil service examination and employment. The reporter found that the disciplinary actions of these candidates include "not taking the test at the designated seat", "deliberately damaging the test paper, answer sheet and answer sheet" and "continuing to answer the questions after the end of the test signal" and so on.

　　Strictly check the "same volume" in many places.

　　It is worth mentioning that in addition to the above violations, the "identical volume" is also a major focus of the candidates’ violation of discipline in this year’s provincial examination office. On the eve of the written civil service provincial examination, many provinces have emphasized that this examination will strictly screen and identify "identical papers".

　　In this year’s provincial examination, many provinces also announced the processing results of "identical papers".

　　Among them, the Shaanxi Provincial Personnel Testing Center has highly similar information on the answers to the "Administrative Professional Ability Test" of this exam, and six candidates who are cheating in the same examination room will be treated as "the test results of this subject are invalid". According to the circular, once warned, if such a situation occurs again, it will be recorded in the integrity file of civil service examination and employment.

　　Fujian and Hunan also gave "invalid test scores of this subject (session)" to four and six candidates who were identified by professional institutions as identical answers respectively.

　　In addition, the recent news that a civil servant cheated in the provincial examination in Guizhou and more than 20 candidates were sentenced to "identical papers" also attracted attention. According to the report of "Qianwei Popularization of Law" on WeChat WeChat official account of Guizhou Provincial Department of Justice, recently, police in Zunyi, Guizhou successfully destroyed an exam cheating gang, and three suspects were criminally detained by the police according to law.

　　It is reported that in order to gain profits, these lawless elements organized candidates to cheat collectively during the civil service examination by selling headphones, transmitters, receivers and other equipment, with more than 20 candidates participating. In the end, because the test papers were identical, these candidates were cancelled.

　　What are the criteria for judging "identical volumes"?

　　For cheating on identical papers, the Measures for Handling Violations of Discipline in Civil Servant Examination, which was issued by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and implemented in October 2016, stipulates that in the process of marking, it is found that the answers of candidates in the same subject are the same, and confirmed by the marking expert group, the examination institution that specifically organizes the implementation of the examination will give it the treatment that the examination results of this subject (session) are invalid.

　　Regarding the criteria for judging "identical papers", the Measures for Handling Violations of Discipline in Civil Servant Examination and Employment clearly stipulates that "the examination institutions at or above the provincial level shall determine the specific methods and standards for answering the same questions".

　　In this regard, Li Manqing, an expert in the public examination of Huatu Education, told the reporter of Zhongxin.com that in the civil service examination, the criteria for judging identical papers are divided into subjective papers and objective papers. For example, in the subjective paper, there is a high degree of consistency between candidates’ answers to the same subject, including written expressions or main right and wrong points; As far as the objective paper is concerned, there is a high degree of consistency between the answers selected and scribbled by more than two candidates in the objective paper.

　　"For example, it is normal that candidates A and B have the same correct answers, but if all or most of the wrong answers are the same, it may be judged by the system as the same volume at this time, and further review is needed." Li Manqing said.

　　Li Manqing said that in order to ensure the openness and fairness of the civil service examination, the relevant departments have standardized on many levels, such as technology, manpower, examination paper setting and protection of rights and interests afterwards. For example, the competent departments of civil servants strengthen the supervision of examinations, improve the technical prevention level to ensure the safety of examinations, prevent organized cheating by grouping questions such as one question and multiple volumes, and detect the information of candidates’ answers through professional institutions to identify identical papers. (End)